<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Briarpatch Magazine &#187; Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briarpatchmagazine.com/tag/afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briarpatchmagazine.com</link>
	<description>Fiercely independent (and often irreverent) news &#38; views.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Peace begins at home: Real alternatives for Canada in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/09/01/peace-begins-at-home-real-alternatives-for-canada-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/09/01/peace-begins-at-home-real-alternatives-for-canada-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Briarpatch Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sept/Oct 2008: Mock Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anti-imperialism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anti-war]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[canadian politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briarpatchmagazine.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h4><strong>By John W. Warnock
<a href="http://www.briarpatchmagazine.com/"><em>Briarpatch Magazine</em></a>
September/October 2008</strong></h4>
<blockquote>
<p align="left">"<em>No nation can donate liberation to another nation. Liberation should be achieved in a country by the people themselves."</em></p>
<p align="left">Malalai Joya, Member, Afghan House of the People</p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left">The U.S. imperial project in Afghanistan has faltered. The government created by the United States lacks credibility and legitimacy. The vast majority of the people remain poor. The drug economy is dominant. Despite an increase in NATO military forces, the armed resistance led by the Taliban is increasing in strength. So what should Canada's response be?</p>
<p align="left">The public debate on Afghanistan has had a very narrow focus in this country. The primary concern has been the role of the Canadian Forces in the counter-insurgency war: How many more Canadians will be killed? How long will our forces remain in Kandahar province? What will the United States think if Canada withdraws from the southern conflict zone? If Canada pulls its forces out of Afghanistan, will there be chaos? Meanwhile, the occupation grinds on and the hopes for peace in Afghanistan recede into the distance.</p>
<p align="left">It is time for Canadians to ask what the Afghan people want. At the top of the list would certainly be an end to the death, destruction and despair of the current occupation (the real "three Ds" that Afghans have inherited from Canada's "development, diplomacy and defence" state-building strategy). The polls all show that a large majority of Afghans want a negotiated settlement and an end to the war. The majority do not want to see the return of the Taliban to government. The fact that the Afghan public supports negotiation with the Taliban insurgents is an indication of how far they are willing to go to end the violence. The current U.S.-NATO policy, supported by the Canadian government, however, only perpetuates the war.</p>
<p align="left">The Afghan people also want their sovereignty, their right to self-determination and their democratic rights. Since October 2001 the United States, its allies and United Nations agencies have directed political, military and economic policy in the country. Afghanistan has been treated like a 19th-century colony.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/09/01/peace-begins-at-home-real-alternatives-for-canada-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghanistan was never Canada&#8217;s war</title>
		<link>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/01/30/afghanistan-was-never-canadas-war/</link>
		<comments>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/01/30/afghanistan-was-never-canadas-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[the briar-wire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/01/30/afghanistan-was-never-canadas-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>By Thomas Walkom
<em>The Toronto Star</em>
January 18, 2008</strong>

American Defence Secretary Robert Gates may well be right when he says that Canadian and European troops in Afghanistan are not well equipped to fight a counter-insurgency campaign. But what has been lost in the controversy over his impolitic remarks is that we did not sign on to fight insurgents – there or anywhere else.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/01/30/afghanistan-was-never-canadas-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Unlawful&#8221; enemy combatants</title>
		<link>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2007/06/09/unlawful-enemy-combatants/</link>
		<comments>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2007/06/09/unlawful-enemy-combatants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briarpatchmagazine.com/test/2007/06/09/unlawful-enemy-combatants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a difference a single word makes. This article only scratches the surface of the absurdity of the US&#8217;s efforts to try a child soldier for attempting to kill a soldier of an invading army &#8212; who was at that very moment trying to kill him. Never mind  that the New York Times, among [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2007/06/09/unlawful-enemy-combatants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
