This is very frightening. On a related note, Canada Post is set to formally withdraw from the Publications Assistance Program (a key support for small media like Briarpatch) in April 2009, and plans to introduce “distance-related pricing” (meaning it will cost us more to send a magazine to Halifax or Toronto than to Saskatoon) in January. The detrimental impact of such changes on the diversity of Canada’s already sparse media environment cannot be overstated. Please take whatever actions you deem appropriate.
-DOM
High-stakes secret review of Canada Post
by Denis Lemelin
Rabble.ca
July 7, 2008
“The fact that the government is not holding public hearings and is proceeding at a breakneck pace with its review suggests that it is not really interested in hearing from the real owners and stakeholders of our post office – the public.”
Over the next few months, our Conservative federal government is conducting a review that will determine the future of universal, public postal service in our country. This review is pretty much a secret review, and it could be bad news for good people.
The government’s review will look at three very basic and important questions: What postal services should people receive? Who should provide them? And should Canada Post continue to have an exclusive privilege to handle addressed letters, or should the letter market be open to competition?
Anyone who thinks that a little competition never hurt anyone might want to take a closer look at how our postal system actually works. Canada Post has an exclusive privilege to handle letters so that it is able to generate enough money to provide affordable postal service to everyone, no matter where they live.
While the exclusive privilege isn’t often discussed, most people seem to like what it does. In fact, 91 per cent of respondents to an Angus Reid poll said universal postal service at a uniform rate is one of the really great things about Canada Post.
Unfortunately, our popular and egalitarian one-price-goes-anywhere service could disappear. If the government decides to eliminate our post office’s exclusive privilege as a result of its review, Canada Post would almost certainly face a downward spiral. Private sector competitors would focus on profitable areas and services, leaving unprofitable parts to our public post office. With fewer profits, Canada Post would find it increasingly difficult – and eventually impossible - to provide uniform and affordable service, especially in rural and remote parts of the county.
Even though the Conservative government’s review could change the very nature of our postal system, the Tories are not planning on holding public hearings or doing much to publicize their examination of Canada Post. They have issued a media release asking for submissions by September 2, 2008. Their advisory panel is contacting “major stakeholders.”
The fact that the government is not holding public hearings and is proceeding at a breakneck pace with its review suggests that it is not really interested in hearing from the real owners and stakeholders of our post office – the public.
It is also disturbing that the chair of the review has written a book, entitled The Politics of Postal Transformation, that recommends that the federal government eliminate the exclusive privilege. Aside from the obvious, it is disturbing because the few countries that have fully removed their post office’s exclusive privilege or monopoly on letters have suffered. They now have fewer jobs, less service and higher postal rates for people and small businesses.
As is, our basic postage rate currently ranks as one of the lowest in the industrial world. Letter mail is secure, cheap, on time 96.1 per cent of the time and delivered to everyone at a single price. In a recent national poll, Canada Post surpassed the CBC and the Supreme Court as the most trusted federal institution in Canada.
This is not to say that our post office is perfect. But it is worth noting that it will be difficult for Canada Post to improve service if the government eliminates the mechanism that funds public postal service – the exclusive privilege.
If you like your secure, trusted, affordable and universal postal service and think the federal government is trying to fix something that isn’t broken, contact the Canada Post Strategic Review at 330 Sparks Street Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0N5, and speak your mind by September 2, 2008.
You might want to express concerns about post office closures. Last time the Conservatives were in office, they closed about 1,500 rural post offices before being stopped by public outrage and an election defeat. Don’t forget to mention that a speedy review without public hearings is hardly a democratic way to decide the fate of our publicly owned post office.
Denis Lemelin is the president of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers.
‹ The Harper ‘Apology’ — Saying ‘Sorry’ with a Forked Tongue •


2 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2008/07/13/the-future-of-universal-public-postal-service-is-at-stake/trackback/
Jul 24, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Peter
What’s next? Privatization of medical care, public libraries? After the Soviet Union’s dissolution, the seizure of various industries and services at wholesale prices by the oligarchs (many of them former Communist party bosses) was mockingly referred to as something that could be loosely translated as “profitization”. What’s not surprising, though, is that this isn’t garnering any attention in the wider mass media. (Thanks, CRTC for standing back whilst media moguls continue concentrating their holdings.) Hats off, Briarpatch!
Aug 12, 2008 at 5:36 pm
zorya
BC already pays private companies for my x-rays and blood tests
libraries? yeah, Blockbuster meets Chapters!
I get “mail” via Canada Post, UPS, USPS International Std, FedEx, DHL and some of Canada Post’s expedited/courier services
the only difference among them is that only Canada Post letter carriers bring me junk mail
welcome to the future